Skip to content

LC3 Grande Confort Lounge Chair

c. 1929/1965

by Charlotte Perriand , Pierre Jeanneret , Le Corbusier

LC3_Confort_Lounge_Chair

Inquire or Request

Regarding

LC3 Grande Confort Lounge Chair

by Charlotte Perriand , Pierre Jeanneret , Le Corbusier
More details here…

Designed in 1929 by Le Corbusier, Pierre Jean­neret, and Char­lotte Perriand, the LC3 Grande Confort Lounge Chair has been produced by Cassina since 1965. The design is defined by an exter­nal tubular steel frame, finished here in taupe grey, which acts as a cage for a sepa­rate uphol­stered volume. This struc­tural logic creates a literal distinc­tion between the load-bearing metal support and the soft elements of the seat.

The chair contains four loose cush­ions — seat, back, and two arms — filled with feather and encased in dark green Grade ZZ glove leather. Unlike tradi­tional armchairs where the frame is concealed, the LC3 exposes its skele­ton, allow­ing the cush­ions to be held in place solely by the tension of the steel. This specific example remains in excel­lent condi­tion, reflect­ing the tech­ni­cal preci­sion and mate­r­ial contrast central to the authors’ collab­o­ra­tive pursuit of equip­ment for living.”

One in stock, like new. 

Charlotte Perriand

France

Charlotte Perriand believed that good design began not with form, but with life. Born in Paris in 1903, she came of age during the rise of modernism but never accepted its austerity at face value. After studying at the École de l’Union Centrale des Arts Décoratifs, she caught Le Corbusier’s attention with her Bar sous le Toit installation—an aluminum and glass interior that announced a new language for domestic space.

Perriand spent her career expanding that language, insisting that interiors could be democratic without losing their sensuality. Her collaborations with Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret shaped the furniture of the machine age, yet her later work—wooden chaises, woven stools, modular shelving—revealed an intimacy modernism often forgot.

From the mountains of Savoie to postwar Japan, she treated design as both a social and material experiment. Wood, metal, bamboo—each was used for its honesty, its human touch. Today, Perriand’s work feels less like a relic of modernism than a quiet blueprint for how to live well: rigorous, humane, and always unfinished in the best sense.

Pierre Jeanneret

Switzerland

Pierre Jeanneret’s practice was defined by a career-long engagement with modernist principles, initially developed alongside his cousin, Le Corbusier. After training at the École des Beaux-Arts in Geneva, Jeanneret joined the Paris studio in the early 1920s, where he contributed to the development of standardized architectural forms and tubular steel furniture. His work during this period focused on the application of industrial methods to domestic and civic environments.

In the postwar era, Jeanneret’s role shifted toward the administrative and structural oversight of Chandigarh, India’s new capital. Residing on-site for fifteen years, he designed a comprehensive body of furniture for the city’s institutional buildings. These pieces—constructed primarily from local teak and cane—are characterized by robust, V-shaped geometries and simple joinery adapted to regional craft capabilities. Pierre Jeanneret’s output remains a significant record of the transition from European modernism to a pragmatic, site-specific functionalism rooted in material economy and local production.

Le Corbusier

Switzerland

Le Corbusier, born Charles-Édouard Jeanneret, defined the trajectory of architectural modernism. His practice was grounded in a program of standardization and the application of industrial logic to the domestic sphere. By the late 1920s, he had codified his methodology into the "Five Points of a New Architecture," a system that emphasized structural independence and the liberation of the floor plan.

His collaboration with Charlotte Perriand and Pierre Jeanneret extended these architectural principles to furniture, utilizing tubular steel and modular components to create objects that functioned as "equipment" for living. In his postwar work, exemplified by the Unité d’Habitation, he moved toward the use of béton brut, or raw concrete, emphasizing the tactile and sculptural weight of the material. Throughout his output, Le Corbusier maintained a focus on proportion and the social implications of design, positioning the built environment as a precise technical response to the requirements of the twentieth century.

More in Interiors

View All

More in Charlotte Perriand

View All